加入 Gitee
与超过 1200万 开发者一起发现、参与优秀开源项目,私有仓库也完全免费 :)
免费加入
文件
该仓库未声明开源许可证文件(LICENSE),使用请关注具体项目描述及其代码上游依赖。
克隆/下载
backport-seccomp-Always-install-filters-for-native-architectu.patch 2.75 KB
一键复制 编辑 原始数据 按行查看 历史
From ba8bce7b562f9ef83a4de697eae2f97cf1806e3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Berg <bberg@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:05:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] seccomp: Always install filters for native architecture
The commit 6597686865ff ("seccomp: don't install filters for archs that
can't use syscalls") introduced a regression where filters may not be
installed for the "native" architecture. This means that setting
SystemCallArchitectures=native for a unit effectively disables the
SystemCallFilter= and SystemCallLog= options.
Conceptually, we have two filter stages:
1. architecture used for syscall (SystemCallArchitectures=)
2. syscall + architecture combination (SystemCallFilter=)
The above commit tried to optimize the filter generation by skipping the
second level filtering when it is not required.
However, systemd will never fully block the "native" architecture using
the first level filter. This makes the code a lot simpler, as systemd
can execve() the target binary using its own architecture. And, it
should be perfectly fine as the "native" architecture will always be the
one with the most restrictive seccomp filtering.
Said differently, the bug arises because (on x86_64):
1. x86_64 is permitted by libseccomp already
2. native != x86_64
3. the loop wants to block x86_64 because the permitted set only
contains "native" (i.e. "native" != "x86_64")
4. x86_64 is marked as blocked in seccomp_local_archs
Thereby we have an inconsistency, where it is marked as blocked in the
seccomp_local_archs array but it is allowed by libseccomp. i.e. we will
skip generating filter stage 2 without having stage 1 in place.
The fix is simple, we just skip the native architecture when looping
seccomp_local_archs. This way the inconsistency cannot happen.
(cherry picked from commit f833df38488ea40fc3d601ccefd64cfa3fce8bb4)
Conflict:NA
Reference:https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/ba8bce7b562f9ef83a4de697eae2f97cf1806e3d
---
src/shared/seccomp-util.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/seccomp-util.c b/src/shared/seccomp-util.c
index 631ca5dd34..31d6b542c0 100644
--- a/src/shared/seccomp-util.c
+++ b/src/shared/seccomp-util.c
@@ -1789,6 +1789,10 @@ int seccomp_restrict_archs(Set *archs) {
for (unsigned i = 0; seccomp_local_archs[i] != SECCOMP_LOCAL_ARCH_END; ++i) {
uint32_t arch = seccomp_local_archs[i];
+ /* See above comment, our "native" architecture is never blocked. */
+ if (arch == seccomp_arch_native())
+ continue;
+
/* That architecture might have already been blocked by a previous call to seccomp_restrict_archs. */
if (arch == SECCOMP_LOCAL_ARCH_BLOCKED)
continue;
--
2.33.0
马建仓 AI 助手
尝试更多
代码解读
代码找茬
代码优化