代码拉取完成,页面将自动刷新
同步操作将从 src-openEuler/systemd 强制同步,此操作会覆盖自 Fork 仓库以来所做的任何修改,且无法恢复!!!
确定后同步将在后台操作,完成时将刷新页面,请耐心等待。
From feb68f6aad36930f0b0c6c70164287c5bc46b64c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 23:03:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fileio: lower maximum virtual file buffer size by one byte
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
When reading virtual files (i.e. procfs, sysfs, …) we currently put a
limit of 4M-1 on that. We have to pick something, and we have to read
these files in a single read() (since the kernel generally doesn't
support continuation read()s for them). 4M-1 is actually the maximum
size the kernel allows for reads from files in /proc/sys/, all larger
reads will result in an ENOMEM error (which is really weird, but the
kernel does what the kernel does). Hence 4M-1 sounds like a smart
choice.
However, we made one mistake here: in order to be able to detect EOFs
properly we actually read one byte more than we actually intend to
return: if that extra byte can be read, then we know the file is
actually larger than our limit and we can generate an EFBIG error from
that. However, if it cannot be read then we know EOF was hit, and we are
good. So ultimately after all we issued a single 4M read, which the
kernel then responds with ENOMEM to. And that means read_virtual_file()
actually doesn't work properly right now on /proc/sys/. Let's fix that.
The fix is simple, lower the limit of the the buffer we intend to return
by one, i.e. 4M-2. That way, the read() we'll issue is exactly as large
as the limit the kernel allows, and we still get safely detect EOF from
it.
(cherry picked from commit 7ab7547a40d456d34120b2f44b26385ac1338ebd)
Conflict:NA
Reference:https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/feb68f6aad36930f0b0c6c70164287c5bc46b64c
---
src/basic/fileio.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/basic/fileio.c b/src/basic/fileio.c
index 99a44fdea2..ba0ca98d72 100644
--- a/src/basic/fileio.c
+++ b/src/basic/fileio.c
@@ -30,14 +30,16 @@
/* The maximum size of the file we'll read in one go in read_full_file() (64M). */
#define READ_FULL_BYTES_MAX (64U*1024U*1024U - 1U)
-/* The maximum size of virtual files we'll read in one go in read_virtual_file() (4M). Note that this limit
- * is different (and much lower) than the READ_FULL_BYTES_MAX limit. This reflects the fact that we use
- * different strategies for reading virtual and regular files: virtual files are generally size constrained:
- * there we allocate the full buffer size in advance. Regular files OTOH can be much larger, and here we grow
- * the allocations exponentially in a loop. In glibc large allocations are immediately backed by mmap()
- * making them relatively slow (measurably so). Thus, when allocating the full buffer in advance the large
- * limit is a problem. When allocating piecemeal it's not. Hence pick two distinct limits. */
-#define READ_VIRTUAL_BYTES_MAX (4U*1024U*1024U - 1U)
+/* The maximum size of virtual files (i.e. procfs, sysfs, and other virtual "API" files) we'll read in one go
+ * in read_virtual_file(). Note that this limit is different (and much lower) than the READ_FULL_BYTES_MAX
+ * limit. This reflects the fact that we use different strategies for reading virtual and regular files:
+ * virtual files we generally have to read in a single read() syscall since the kernel doesn't support
+ * continuation read()s for them. Thankfully they are somewhat size constrained. Thus we can allocate the
+ * full potential buffer in advance. Regular files OTOH can be much larger, and there we grow the allocations
+ * exponentially in a loop. We use a size limit of 4M-2 because 4M-1 is the maximum buffer that /proc/sys/
+ * allows us to read() (larger reads will fail with ENOMEM), and we want to read one extra byte so that we
+ * can detect EOFs. */
+#define READ_VIRTUAL_BYTES_MAX (4U*1024U*1024U - 2U)
int fopen_unlocked(const char *path, const char *options, FILE **ret) {
assert(ret);
--
2.33.0
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。