加入 Gitee
与超过 1200万 开发者一起发现、参与优秀开源项目,私有仓库也完全免费 :)
免费加入
文件
该仓库未声明开源许可证文件(LICENSE),使用请关注具体项目描述及其代码上游依赖。
克隆/下载
backport-Don-t-take-a-write-lock-to-retrieve-a-value-from-a-s.patch 3.24 KB
一键复制 编辑 原始数据 按行查看 历史
From d6e07491ab2838c74e7070bd3247073cb1222e36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 16:15:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Don't take a write lock to retrieve a value from a stack
ossl_x509_store_ctx_get_by_subject() was taking a write lock for the
store, but was only (usually) retrieving a value from the stack of
objects. We take a read lock instead.
Partially fixes #20286
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20952)
(cherry picked from commit 80935bf5ad309bf6c03591acf1d48fe1db57b78f)
---
crypto/x509/x509_lu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_lu.c b/crypto/x509/x509_lu.c
index d8927bda07..1fb46586f0 100644
--- a/crypto/x509/x509_lu.c
+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_lu.c
@@ -41,14 +41,19 @@ void X509_LOOKUP_free(X509_LOOKUP *ctx)
OPENSSL_free(ctx);
}
-int X509_STORE_lock(X509_STORE *s)
+int X509_STORE_lock(X509_STORE *xs)
{
- return CRYPTO_THREAD_write_lock(s->lock);
+ return CRYPTO_THREAD_write_lock(xs->lock);
}
-int X509_STORE_unlock(X509_STORE *s)
+static int x509_store_read_lock(X509_STORE *xs)
{
- return CRYPTO_THREAD_unlock(s->lock);
+ return CRYPTO_THREAD_read_lock(xs->lock);
+}
+
+int X509_STORE_unlock(X509_STORE *xs)
+{
+ return CRYPTO_THREAD_unlock(xs->lock);
}
int X509_LOOKUP_init(X509_LOOKUP *ctx)
@@ -321,9 +326,19 @@ int X509_STORE_CTX_get_by_subject(const X509_STORE_CTX *vs,
stmp.type = X509_LU_NONE;
stmp.data.ptr = NULL;
- if (!X509_STORE_lock(store))
+ if (!x509_store_read_lock(store))
return 0;
-
+ /* Should already be sorted...but just in case */
+ if (!sk_X509_OBJECT_is_sorted(store->objs)) {
+ X509_STORE_unlock(store);
+ /* Take a write lock instead of a read lock */
+ X509_STORE_lock(store);
+ /*
+ * Another thread might have sorted it in the meantime. But if so,
+ * sk_X509_OBJECT_sort() exits early.
+ */
+ sk_X509_OBJECT_sort(store->objs);
+ }
tmp = X509_OBJECT_retrieve_by_subject(store->objs, type, name);
X509_STORE_unlock(store);
@@ -505,7 +520,6 @@ static int x509_object_idx_cnt(STACK_OF(X509_OBJECT) *h, X509_LOOKUP_TYPE type,
X509_OBJECT stmp;
X509 x509_s;
X509_CRL crl_s;
- int idx;
stmp.type = type;
switch (type) {
@@ -522,16 +536,18 @@ static int x509_object_idx_cnt(STACK_OF(X509_OBJECT) *h, X509_LOOKUP_TYPE type,
return -1;
}
- idx = sk_X509_OBJECT_find_all(h, &stmp, pnmatch);
- return idx;
+ /* Assumes h is locked for read if applicable */
+ return sk_X509_OBJECT_find_all(h, &stmp, pnmatch);
}
+/* Assumes h is locked for read if applicable */
int X509_OBJECT_idx_by_subject(STACK_OF(X509_OBJECT) *h, X509_LOOKUP_TYPE type,
const X509_NAME *name)
{
return x509_object_idx_cnt(h, type, name, NULL);
}
+/* Assumes h is locked for read if applicable */
X509_OBJECT *X509_OBJECT_retrieve_by_subject(STACK_OF(X509_OBJECT) *h,
X509_LOOKUP_TYPE type,
const X509_NAME *name)
--
2.33.0
马建仓 AI 助手
尝试更多
代码解读
代码找茬
代码优化