加入 Gitee
与超过 1200万 开发者一起发现、参与优秀开源项目,私有仓库也完全免费 :)
免费加入
文件
该仓库未声明开源许可证文件(LICENSE),使用请关注具体项目描述及其代码上游依赖。
克隆/下载
backport-sd-bus-fix-missing-initializer-in-SD_BUS_VTABLE_END-.patch 4.11 KB
一键复制 编辑 原始数据 按行查看 历史
From cdaf655f73bb3be10d47ab6f00d71a8d0b1a81e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:10:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sd-bus: fix missing initializer in SD_BUS_VTABLE_END (#20253)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
When two fields were added to the vtable.x.start struct, no initializers
for these were added to SD_BUS_VTABLE_END which also (ab)used that
struct (albeit sneakily by using non-designated initialization).
While C tolerates this, C++ prohibits these missing initializers, and
both g++ and clang++ will complain when using -Wextra.
This patch gives SD_BUS_VTABLE_END its own case in the union and
clarifies its initialization.
I tested the behaviour of g++ 10.2 and clang 11 in various cases. Both will warn
(-Wmissing-field-initializers, implied by -Wextra) if you provide initializers for some
but not all fields of a struct. Declaring x.end as empty struct or using an empty initializer
{} to initialize the union or one of its members is valid C++ but not C, although both gcc
and clang accept it without warning (even at -Wall -Wextra -std=c90/c++11) unless you
use -pedantic (which requires -std=c99/c++2a to support designated initializers).
Interestingly, .x = { .start = { 0, 0, NULL } } is the only initializer I found for the union
(among candidates for SD_BUS_VTABLE_END) where gcc doesn't zero-fill it entirely
when allocated on stack, it looked like it did in all other cases (I only examined this on
32-bit arm). clang always seems to initialize all bytes of the union.
[zjs: test case:
$ cat vtable-test.cc
#include "sd-bus.h"
const sd_bus_vtable vtable[] = {
SD_BUS_VTABLE_END
};
$ g++ -I src/systemd/ -Wall -Wmissing-field-initializers -c vtable-test.cc
vtable-test.cc:5:1: warning: missing initializer for member ‘sd_bus_vtable::<unnamed union>::<unnamed struct>::features’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
5 | };
| ^
vtable-test.cc:5:1: warning: missing initializer for member ‘sd_bus_vtable::<unnamed union>::<unnamed struct>::vtable_format_reference’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
$ clang++ -I src/systemd/ -Wmissing-field-initializers -c vtable-test.cc
vtable-test.cc:4:4: warning: missing field 'features' initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
SD_BUS_VTABLE_END
^
src/systemd/sd-bus-vtable.h:188:28: note: expanded from macro 'SD_BUS_VTABLE_END'
.x = { { 0 } }, \
^
1 warning generated.
Both warnings are gone with the patch.]
(cherry picked from commit 654eaa403070d3c897454a5190603fda4071c3ff)
Conflict:NA
Reference:https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/cdaf655f73bb3be10d47ab6f00d71a8d0b1a81e3
---
src/systemd/sd-bus-vtable.h | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/systemd/sd-bus-vtable.h b/src/systemd/sd-bus-vtable.h
index 75f8848360..35c942b16c 100644
--- a/src/systemd/sd-bus-vtable.h
+++ b/src/systemd/sd-bus-vtable.h
@@ -75,6 +75,9 @@ struct sd_bus_vtable {
uint64_t features;
const unsigned *vtable_format_reference;
} start;
+ struct {
+ size_t reserved;
+ } end;
struct {
const char *member;
const char *signature;
@@ -185,7 +188,11 @@ struct sd_bus_vtable {
{ \
.type = _SD_BUS_VTABLE_END, \
.flags = 0, \
- .x = { { 0 } }, \
+ .x = { \
+ .end = { \
+ .reserved = 0, \
+ }, \
+ }, \
}
#define _SD_ECHO(X) X
--
2.33.0
马建仓 AI 助手
尝试更多
代码解读
代码找茬
代码优化